Article critique is different from genuine essay writing services offered in the market. An article critique is a task that requires a student to critically analyze and reflect on a research article. The main goal is to determine the piece’s strong and weak points, as well as how effectively the author interprets the sources. Simply expressed, a criticism examines the validity and efficacy of the arguments presented by the article’s author. Critical thinking is the key to writing this paper successfully. Every study paper author must persuade readers of the accuracy of his or her opinion, even if it is slanted. As a result, being a skilled researcher, having the correct tools to pick out facts from fiction, and having sound critical thinking abilities are the only means to separate solid arguments from weak ones.
Table of Contents
Initial Steps
It is critical to have a good comprehension of the work that will be reviewed before you begin writing.
- Examine the work that is being discussed.
- Make a list of important aspects of the task.
- Develop a comprehension of the work’s core argument or aim.
- Think about how your work ties to a larger topic or context.
Hill Papers will walk you through the process of writing this sort of paper step by step in this guide. We’ve put together a simple 3-step tutorial on how to summarise and evaluate an article to make your job easier:
Step 1: Reading the article
First and foremost, you must read the content thoroughly to evaluate it. You must read the item numerous times to ensure that you completely comprehend the material offered.
Step 2: Collecting Proof
The first phase will assist you with reading and comprehending the text, as well as critically analysing and reflecting on it. Now that you have a general notion of where you want to go with your criticism paper, it’s time to start gathering evidence. When writing an article critique, one of the most important things to check for is any logical fallacies. It is not simple to determine whether the author’s basic notion is logical, but it is a necessary step in completing the assignment. Undereducated people frequently fall prey to simple logical fallacies. Accepting information based on the sensations and/or emotions it elicits, rather than the supporting reasoning, is one example of this.
Step 3: Formatting the Paper
A criticism paper, like any other written project, should be properly prepared and constructed. An introduction, summary, critique, and conclusion comprise a conventional article critique. A concise checklist is provided below to assist you in grasping the concept of how an excellent paper should be formatted:
Introduction
The introduction should be brief (less than 10% of the total word count), and you should:
- Give the title of the work being evaluated, as well as the date it was made and the author’s or creator’s name.
- Summarise the work’s core argument or aim.
- Clarify the work’s creation context, which might include the social or political environment, the work’s place in a creative or intellectual tradition, or the work’s link to the creator’s own experience.
- Put a conclusion statement that indicates how you will evaluate the work – for example, if you will give it a favourable, negative, or neutral rating.
Summary
Summarize the major concepts and discuss how the designer depicts them utilising techniques, styles, mediums, characters, or symbols objectively. This summary is generally shorter than the critical evaluation and should not be the emphasis of the critique. It should include:
- Article’s main points
- Arguments in the article
- Findings of the article
Critique
This part should include a thorough and extensive evaluation of the many aspects of the work, assessing how successfully the author was able to accomplish the goal via them. For example, you would evaluate a novel’s narrative structure, characterization, and setting; you may evaluate a painting’s composition, brush strokes, color, and light; and you might evaluate a research project’s subject selection, experiment design, data analysis, and conclusions. A critical review is more than just a list of negative impressions. It should dissect the work and point out both its merits and flaws. In light of the work’s aim, it should review and evaluate its success. In short, the critique:
- Highlights the strengths and weaknesses in the article
- States opinions about the accuracy, clarity, and relevancy of the article using examples
This assessment is prepared in a rigorous academic language and presented in a logical manner. Your thoughts should be grouped and organised into paragraphs. Begin with the overall impressions and work your way down to the technical specifics. For shorter reviews, start with the works’ merits and then go on to their flaws. In lengthy reviews, you might want to break down the benefits and drawbacks of each significant essential question into separate paragraphs. Provide evidence from the work itself, such as a quote or an example, and provide evidence from relevant sources to support the rating. Describe how this evidence backs up your assessment of the work.
Conclusion
This is generally a short paragraph that comprises the following:
- A statement conveying the overall assessment of the work.
- A description of the primary reasons for the formation of this evaluation, as determined during the critical review.
- Recommendations for work improvement may be useful in some cases.
Reference List
Include all of the materials you used to write your critique. If you’re not sure which referencing style to use, ask your professor or teacher.
Main Purpose of Writing an Article Critique
- Describe the author’s key points and the message he or she is trying to convey.
- Analyze each essential and intriguing aspect in the article and provide an explanation for it.
- Ascertain the author’s aim.
- Summarize and assess the worth of an article, indicating whether you agree or disagree with the author and providing evidence to support your position.
Important Tips
- An article criticism, despite its name, does not merely provide critical and negative input on an article. For a specific piece, a good critique should offer both positive and negative feedback.
- To prevent charges of plagiarism, use direct quotations from the author’s work whenever possible.
- In the third person, write the critique.
Important Keywords to use in a Critique
It might be tough to find the correct words to communicate your point of view in critical writing. It’s critical to communicate your argument properly while also avoiding seeming biased or overzealous in your support or criticism of the author. The finest forms of expression are frequently neutral but effective phrases that are acceptable and valuable to your audience. The following are a few keywords that are regularly used in critical writing:
- Evidence
- Describe
- Argument
- Logical
- Facts
- Opinions
- Examples
- Statistics
- Expert opinions
- Emotional appeals
- Ethical appeals
- Logical appeals
- Relevant
- Representative
- Accurate
- Reasonable
- Logical
- Fallacies
- Flawed
Conclusion
You assess the reading, define your personal reaction to it, and construct a clear, short explanation of the evidence for your reaction if your professor asks you to write a criticism of an article or an essay. Your understanding of the discipline in which you’re working serves as the foundation for your explanation. Reading is the foundation for effective criticism. The majority of critiques are written in the third person. Check with your teacher to see what he or she prefers. Make a point of reading your assignment sheet thoroughly. There may be some deviations from the specified plan. Keep in mind that instructors want more analysis than summation.
